The SCOTUS Ruling That’s Changing Carrier Selection

The Supreme Court’s decision in Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC raises scrutiny on one of the most important parts of a broker’s workflow: carrier selection. 

In a unanimous 9-0 ruling, the Court determined that freight brokers are not shielded from state-level negligent-hiring lawsuits under the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act (FAAAA). The decision allows personal injury claims against brokers to proceed when questions arise around the safety of the carrier selected to haul a load. 

For brokers, the ruling changes how carrier selection decisions may be evaluated after an incident occurs. 

Federal operating authority alone is no longer enough to point to when defending carrier selection decisions. Courts may now look more closely at whether brokers ignored warning signs tied to a carrier’s safety history, inspection performance, or operational record. 

Why the ruling matters for brokers 

The case centered on allegations that a broker hired a carrier with a conditional safety rating and a history of driver qualification deficiencies. 

The Supreme Court’s opinion clarified an important distinction inside FAAAA. While the law limits state regulation tied to prices, routes, and services, it does not eliminate a state’s authority to regulate motor vehicle safety. 

The ruling makes carrier selection practices more central to how broker liability may be evaluated in court, adding more pressure for broker due diligence than ever before. 

Judge holding gavel in courtroom
Carrier selection decisions face greater scrutiny 

For years, brokers have worked in an environment where FMCSA authority often served as a baseline indicator that a carrier was approved to operate. 

The ruling increases attention on how carriers are evaluated and documented. 

Questions that may carry more weight moving forward include: 

  • Did the broker review the carrier’s safety history?  
  • Were there repeated roadside violations or inspection issues?  
  • Was the carrier operating under a conditional safety rating?  
  • Were warning signs documented and evaluated?  
  • Is there a record of the broker’s due diligence process?  
  • Did the broker become aware of a problem while the motor carrier was transporting one of their brokered loads? 

The decision does not mean brokers are automatically liable when accidents occur. 

It does mean carrier selection workflows may become a more central focus in litigation, underwriting, and insurance review. 

The operational impact on broker workflows 

The ruling comes at a time when brokers are already managing tighter margins, growing documentation demands, and rising compliance expectations. 

Now, the ability to demonstrate consistent carrier vetting may become even more important across several areas of the business: 

Litigation exposure 

Plaintiff attorneys may place greater focus on the broker’s decision-making process and whether safety concerns were overlooked during carrier selection. 

Insurance and underwriting 

Insurance providers may begin placing more emphasis on documented carrier risk management practices, auditability, and ongoing monitoring. 

Workflow consistency 

Brokerages may need stronger consistency around how carriers are reviewed, approved, monitored, and retained inside their networks. 

The challenge for many organizations is scale. 

Reviewing carrier history manually across thousands of carriers creates operational friction and increases the likelihood that important details are missed. 

The ruling increases pressure on brokers to show how carrier decisions are made and monitored over time. That creates a stronger need for systems that support consistent carrier evaluation, centralized safety visibility, ongoing monitoring, and documented review processes. 

How brokers are strengthening carrier vetting workflows 

CAB by Fusable has been helping the transportation industry evaluate and understand risk for decades. Through its Motor Carrier Brokerage solution, CAB helps freight brokers build more consistent and defensible carrier vetting workflows using centralized safety, inspection, operational, and monitoring data. 

Many of the nation’s top freight brokers and leading shippers use MC Brokerage to strengthen their risk management strategies and improve visibility into the motor carriers moving their freight. 

Instead of relying on fragmented research or static snapshots, brokers can evaluate carriers through a more complete operational view.

laptop screen displaying the CAB platform

That includes visibility into:

  • Safety history  
  • Inspection trends  
  • Authority status  
  • Insurance monitoring  
  • Operational patterns  
  • Alerts and ongoing carrier changes  
  • BASICs and ISS score evaluation  

The platform also supports ongoing carrier monitoring, helping brokers identify potential safety exposures earlier and maintain stronger consistency around carrier review processes over time. 

As carrier selection decisions face greater scrutiny, brokers need workflows that make vetting more visible, repeatable, and easier to document. 

Speak with one of our experts today