It is that time of year again. I get to write this to you from the Green Mountains in Vermont. The trip here makes me realize just how long I have been at this trucking stuff. I look at all of the trucks on the road traveling up Interstate 95 and 91 and realize that I know more about some of those companies than the driver does. It is wonderful to take some time off and enjoy family vacation time. I hope you all get a chance to do so.
This month we report:
INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDING AND THE SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BILL – U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood announced that there was $17 billion in loans available for critical infrastructure projects across the country now that the surface transportation bill has been passed. The recently enacted surface transportation bill, known as MAP-21, provided $1.7 billion in capital over two years for the TIFIA credit assistance program, up from $120 million in 2012, making it the largest transportation infrastructure finance fund in the Department’s history. The DOT also announced the establishment of the Project Finance Center (PFC) to help state and local government project sponsors analyze financial options for highway, transit, rail, intermodal and other surface transportation projects facing funding challenges.
GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS IMPACTING JOB CREATION? – Who would have thought that could be the case? The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform released its report titled “Continuing Oversight of Regulatory Impediments to Job Creation: Job Creators Still Buried by Red Tape” The study commented that following regulations may be problematic and impact job creation:
• Hours of Service
• Duplicative CDL background checks and credentialing for hazardous materials drivers
• A broaden definition of a tank truck
• A rule that requires truckers to submit a copy of their annual biennial medical certificate to the state agency that issues their CDL
• A rule that requires carriers to review every driver’s motor vehicle record annually to ensure that they are safe and qualified to continue driving despite the fact that many trucking companies review their drivers’ record, anyway, every time they received a driving violation.
• CSA
• Expectation of a proposed rule for judging safety for motor carriers.
• EOBR mandate
• Proposed electronic stability control rulemaking for heavy trucks, and
• A heavy vehicle speed limiter proposed rule.
HOURS OF SERVICE – The hours of service rules continue to be attacked. This month one coalition filed a brief seeking to vacate 2 elements of the rules – the 34 hour restart and the 11 hour driving limit. The group claims that the FMSCA has repeatedly ignored a Congressional mandate to adopt Hours of Service rules that reduce driver fatigue, increase highway safety and protect driver health by adopting a rule that allows more weekly driving hours.
DRIVER DATABASE – The FMCSA is getting hit from all sides this month. The Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association has brought suit alleging that the database of driver information lacks assurance of accuracy and a functioning process for dispute resolution. The lawsuit asks the court to order FMCSA to purge all data for which there has not been a judicial determination of guilt; purge all reports where a court has dismissed or ruled the driver not guilty; purge all reports that are not “serious driver-related violation(s)”; enjoin the agency from distributing information without any reference to a dispute and a summary of the dispute; and enjoin the agency from distributing false, inaccurate, incomplete or misleading inspection reports.
SMS METHODOLOGY – Another group has filed suit against the FMCSA seeking review of the regulator’s “New Resources Available for Shippers, Brokers, and Insurers”. They allege that the publication is a “bureaucratic overreach without process.” They claim that the publication seeks to transfer the obligation to evaluate the safety of carriers to shippers, brokers and insurers, rather than to the FMCSA. These groups take the position that the current SMS methodology inappropriately brands safe motor carriers.
In other news, the FMCSA announced a review of crash weighting which is a pivotal issue in the CSA controversy. Currently, all crashes, whether a motor carrier is at fault or not, count against the carrier in scores derived from data in the CSA safety measurement system. The agency will “analyze a process” for updating the state-reported crash records it receives to include a determination of a motor carrier’s role in a crash. The agency expects to release the results of the study in the summer of 2013. Read More