-->
Menu

Bits & Pieces

Gemza v. Zhao et al.

image_print

Joel P. Gemza, Plaintiff, 

v. 

Zhao, et al.,  Defendants. 

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 

ATLANTA DIVISION 

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 

 This is a personal injury action. It is before the Court on the Defendant Sunset Pacific Logistics Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 93]. A complaint should be dismissed under Rule 12(b)(6) only where it appears that the facts alleged fail to state a “plausible” claim for relief. Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S. Ct. 1937, 1949 (2009); Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). A complaint may survive a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, however, even if it is “improbable” that a plaintiff would be able to prove those facts; even if the possibility of recovery is extremely “remote and unlikely.” Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 556 (2007) (citations and quotations omitted). In ruling on a motion to dismiss, the court must accept factual allegations as true and construe them in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. See Quality Foods de Centro America, S.A. v. Latin American Agribusiness Dev. Corp., S.A., 711 F.2d 989, 994-95 (11th Cir. 1983); see also Sanjuan v. American Bd. of Psychiatry and Neurology, Inc., 40 F.3d 247, 251 (7th Cir. 1994) (noting that at the pleading stage, the plaintiff “receives the benefit of imagination”). Generally, notice pleading is all that is required for a valid complaint. See Lombard’s, Inc. v. Prince Mfg., Inc., 753 F.2d 974, 975 (11th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1082 (1986). Under notice pleading, the plaintiff need only give the defendant fair notice of the plaintiff’s claim and the grounds upon which it rests. See Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 93 (2007) (citing Twombly, 550 U.S. at 555). 

For the reasons set forth in the motion, the Court lacks personal jurisdiction of this Defendant. The First Amended Complaint also fails to make out a plausible claim against this Defendant. The Defendant Sunset Pacific Logistics Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 93] is GRANTED. 

SO ORDERED, this 1st day of March, 2023. 

THOMAS W. THRASH, JR. 

United States District Judge 

© 2024 Central Analysis Bureau